Windows ce aim




















Asked by:. Archived Forums. Windows Embedded Compact Platform Development. NET using Platform Builder. Sign in to vote. Thank you for taking time to look at this post. As a result of the broad range of readily available hardware add-ons, Handheld PC devices fast became the interface for the businessman on the move.

The CE 2 operating system was designed to run on a multitude of new, low power device specific microprocessors. Over the course of the entire CE2 generation these included:. These features came about, largely because of lessons learned from CE 1. The first CE 2. Windows CE 2 was also able to handle larger amounts of data, with broader storage media support, and an increase in the Object Store size to 4MB.

This allowed for more complex, specifically tailored applications to be created which could take advantage of the more robust and featured hardware required to do it. The colour displays were able at this stage to support 24 bit colour, however the introduction of colour display adapters went hand in hand with depleted battery performance. Network support was included in the built-in driver database with the 2. Windows CE 2. True Type became the font standard in Windows CE 2.

The change to True Type in 2. With the release of 2. A secondary advantage of the shift to True Type is the ability to allow for text zooming within applications, adding an extra layer of accessibility to the Handheld PC platform.

The 2. Running off of the Windows CE 2. It was the lack of native productivity and communication tools, combined with an impression that Microsoft were unwilling to refresh the interface of the Palm-Sized PC which inevitably lead to it being a short lived release. Developers were further restricted by the lack of support for ActiveX controls, which once again were prevalent on Handheld PC 2. The result was the Pocket PC. The Palm-Sized PC's history was unsteady from the outset. When it was originally launched it was simply named the Palm PC.

However 3Com, the parent company behind the long established Pilot, Palm Pilot and Palm PDA's successfully challenged Microsoft on the grounds of trademark infringement, and, in an announcement on April 8th Microsoft backed down. To this day Group Leaders MVP's on Microsoft public newsgroups will still make a point of correcting you should you happen to miss the '-sized' portion of the name.

Thought Windows CE 2. This was subsequently updated to 2. The release was designed to provide the Handheld PC experience in a QVGA subset, in conjunction with enhancements designed to cater for the specific cultural needs of the orient.

Pocket Internet Explorer was bundled into the Operating system. Palm-Size PC 1. It would be over a year before the benefits of Windows CE 2. The Palm-sized PC release, Wyvern was effectively nothing more than an interim platform update, bringing the small form factor device up to the Windows CE 2.

Despite the updated core, the Pocket Office applications and Pocket Internet Explorer were still absent from the package, much to the frustration of existing users. Wyvern also introduced Windows CE Services 2. Amongst many enhancements and new features in the release were the inclusion of Microsoft Pocket Access, and the ability to open Microsoft Word and Excel files without needing to convert them to their mobile counterparts. This release also enabled a significant hardware to change.

Devices that resembled sub-notebooks were introduced onto the market. Those that did, offered upgrades under the Microsoft project codename 'Callisto'.

No large volume consumer devices were ever released with Windows CE 2. OEM's decided that providing interim updates to existing customers wasn't necessary, mainly due to Windows CE 2. As a result of this, most OEM's did not see 2.

Of the few CE 2. Despite the relatively insignificant uptake of Windows CE 2. Version 2. The new Platform Builder became a readily accessible commercial product, allowing for uptake of Windows CE not seen before.

Along with security, stability and library improvements came significant shell level enhancements. A new, larger footprint and vastly more capable version of Microsoft Internet Explorer was included.

Based on the Internet Explorer 4. With a desktop standard web-browser Windows CE could be targeted at a newer niche market, looking for low cost, fast turn around devices. Designed to remove the support and stability issues associated with running mainstream Windows Operating Systems, devices such as web terminals, kiosks and richer, more diverse interactive point of sale terminals could be created based on the compact CE framework. Each successive Windows CE core release since 2. CE 2 as an entity was released in an OEM format only, and had many minor re-releases there after.

Conversely, all Platform construction tools used codenames of tools used to cut down trees. Following the theme from Windows CE 1. ActiveSync predominantly remained in the realm of Windows CE 3. For more on the lineage of Windows CE Services 2. Microsoft stopped their Windows CE 2 development when the decision was made to update Microsoft's Mobile Device product line, with a new bold universal operating system. Sporting new functionality on the device, and broader hardware support which would better make use of the increasing levels of new mobile hardware technology, as well as meet the needs of the on-demand consumer by making better use of recent strides made in CPU and battery performance.

Windows CE 3 heralded a substantial change in direction for the Windows Mobile device development teams. Microsoft took the decision with the release of Windows CE 3. The Taskbar and Start Menu were removed, replaced with similar, but less obvious components, and moved to a permanent home along the top of the display.

New communication features and application layer support were added to extend the functionality of the old Palm-Sized PC's. The changes finally saw the delivery of Pocket Office onto the QVGA form factor The primary goal for the new release was to move the appeal of Microsoft's portable device offerings beyond the general PDA user, and into new fields such as knowledge workers and mobile workers. The Pocket PC program ran under the development code name Rapier, a type of sword.

While Microsoft were revolutionising their work on the Handheld PC's younger sister. The new Platform Builder provided the functionality of the Windows CE 3 Core, as well as incorporating the various new technologies that had emerged during and since the CE 2. However the remaining updates were far from as illustrious as that of the Pocket PC. However HPC had failed to address many of the key issues that the End User had with the applications that were onboard.

The supporting hardware technologies in were not up the standards required to run the modified Windows code. With the commercial use of bit processors only starting to become standard, the CPU's and and Memory architecture were not powerful or efficient enough to take the loads required by the considerable advancements made in the software. Secondly, battery technology in was not cheap enough nor able to maintain useful functionality for long enough when using standard PC hardware.

After repeated discussion with both their OEM partners as well as focus groups. Microsoft withdrew operations on WinPad and cancelled the project completely in the Autumn of At the same time a second project was also quietly getting underway within Redmond Codename Pulsar , the concept was to create a wireless, general use consumer device which would be akin to a "Pager on Steroids".

The idea was based around creating a simple to use multifunction device, with a small amount of input functions just a few buttons and couple it with a radically different hardware setup. To Microsoft, this was an appealing prospect as it would enable them to break away from the complex, and often complicated PC software market and focus on simplifying their technologies for what Bill Gates and the thinkers within Microsoft increasingly believe would be the future.

The general process for building an image is:. The primary change is in the selection of the correct BSP and additional considerations for the CE image. This guide assumes you are already familiar with the process to build a Windows CE system image, but it is worth looking more deeply at the changed section. Step 2 is the only part of the previous OS Design project process that is changed when using the CE App Container, see below for additional details.

After doing this, you will have the ability to configure the options and sub-projects just like you would normally do for a Windows Embedded Compact image.

The section below only provides additional actions to execute at certain stages of the IoT Core image building process. Unlike the process of building a Windows Embedded Compact image, Windows 10 IoT Core decouples yet integrates the creation of firmware, board support packages, image definition, and application inclusion.

By utilizing different technologies for these pieces, you can separate the work you need to do amongst different teams or individuals in your organization. Create a workspace. Create your product definition. Add features and applications to your product. Deploy the FFU to the device and test. Finalize and sign your retail FFU. While some of these steps are like the process of using Platform Builder PB to create a device image, it is worth exploring some areas more deeply.

OLD directory in the workspace. You can also build Single features as needed but in general you should rebuild all the packages prior to the step of building your FFU as best practice.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000